Emily Yoffee From Slate Must Read Not Monsters: Analyzing the Stories of Child Molesters
"If
we really want to understand this crime then we need to accept this fact-that most
child molesters are not monsters. They are human beings who might have more in
common with us than not," writes Pamela D. Schultz, author of Not
Monsters: Analyzing the Stories of Child Molesters.
Not Monsters is an academic approach to understanding why people commit
such monstrous crimes like child molestation and rape. Between 1995 and 2000
Schultz conducted countless one-on-one interviews with incarcerated child
molesters and rapists. She uses a self-narrative approach to document, analyze,
and to tell the stories of 9 convicted sex offenders. "The focus of this
book is to show the troubling statistics surrounding child sexual abuse, and
its impact upon victims, perpetrators, and society, take on a new meaning when
viewed through the framework of narrative, which captures the nature of a
discursively created reality."
Just
wait for one hot minute. Inhale. Exhale. Okay, good! Consider this one
concept: the cycle of abuse repeats itself. Schultz does not take the topic of
child molestation lightly as she openly shares her own story of how
'The Man Who Molested Me' penetrated every thought, feeling, and emotion from
the time she was a young girl until she graduated from her doctoral program.
It
is through her experience as a victim of sexual abuse, Schultz
is able to grab her audience's attention through a thought-provoking,
self-narrative analysis by nudging her reader's to leave their
comfort zone, and to be open-minded enough to consider the opposing side.
Though great strides, emotional outbursts, and internal conquests of me wanting
to put a dagger in the heart of such monstrosity, Schultz ever-so-diligently
presents a case of 'hate the crime not the person,' scenario.
Not
Monsters is
unique as I find myself questioning Schultz's sympathy for the offender as
opposed to the victim. "To perceive a child molester as a child himself
goes contrary to the expectation that he is a monster, since when we see
him as someone was once vulnerable, and perhaps even innocent, suddenly he
becomes difficult to hold on to the image of himself as irrevocably evil."
Justice
for the person whom rapes another? Seriously? What about poetic justice for the
victim? Not in all cases the abused become the abuser. Then, what?
Finish
reading the paragraph...
"If
we recognize that the impulses of some of these men were shaped by their
experiences as children--in circumstances they had no control over--then we
have to take responsibility for creating, or at the very least perpetuating,
the environments that spawn such behavior. And what society wants to do with
that?"
And,
so this conflicted conversation that I have with myself of trying to
understand Schultz's justification in sympathizing with these criminals comes
to a halt when she concludes with:
"If
we want to truly combat this crime, then we have to accept the premise that
truth is relative and perceptions are paramount in the social constructions of
sex and power that dominate our lives. Listening to the stories told by the
victims of sexual abuse is only half the battle. Being willing to listen to the
stories of offenders can help us win the war."
After
taking an emotional stance against empathy for these "not monsters,"
I am then presented with an opposing scenario of Schultz's analytical
approach when I am huffing and puffing my way through a MONSTER of
a run on the elliptical while listening to The Jillian Michaels Show.
On
December 2, 2013, the show airs an episode entitled Girls & Booze.
Janice talks about an article that was published in Slate written by
Emily Yoffe called College Women Stop Getting Drunk. In short, this is a
study on college girls who are being raped by their male counterparts
due to drinking too much while in a public forum. A large section in College
Women Stop Getting Drunk is dedicated to encouraging women to stop
drinking so they won't fall victim to sexual abuse.
Here, Jillian
opens up to her audience and explains her deepest concerns that she has for her
daughter, Lu (approximately 4 years old) and Phoenix (1 year old). She says
that one of her worst fears--nightmares--is that her daughter will be
one of those girls and her son will be one of those boys. "My
biggest fear is that I will have unprepared my daughter and she will be
insecure enough, naive enough for that [rape] to occur."
We
are all aware of the story of the drunk 15-year-old girl that gets annihilated
at a party, the male "friend" takes advantage of the girl in her
weakened state and sexually abuses her. Because she is too drunk to remember,
or to even know that she was raped in the first place, she finds herself being
ridiculed and bullied because the idiot whom raped her, video taped it using
his smart phone, and blasted it all over the Internet. This girl is wrecked.
She can't take the stress and the humiliation of one bad decision and kills
herself. Jillian is afraid that Lu could be this 15-year-old-girl. On the same
token, Jillian is petrified that Phoenix could grow up to be THAT guy who
takes advantage of THAT girl in a similar situation. Jillian says,
"I know you are suppose to love unconditionally, but I don't know if I
could love an individual that could do that." Janice pipes in with her
words of wisdom: "hate the action, not the person." Sounds familiar,
doesn't it?
Yoffe
writes as a resolution to end the 15-year-old- drunken-suicidal-scenario
is to end the war with drunken behavior. Yoffee says, "perpetrators
are responsible for committing their crimes and they should be brought to
justice. But are failing to let women know they are rendering themselves
defenseless, terrible things can be done to them. You women are getting a
distorted message that their right to match men drink for drink is a feminist
issue..."
Janice
elaborates much like a college professor and says, "a woman can still be
raped whether she is drunk or not. Taking away the bad activity doesn't mean
that bad things won't happen." A feminist or not, we can all agree
with this statement. And, here it comes...Jillian Michaels' two-sense. She
adds, if the contributing factor [alcohol] is taken away, it lessens the
chances of falling victim to a devastating crime. The guy is going to go
after the girl that is passed out drunk, not the sober girl that can
scream, "NO." Makes sense, right?
Janice,
finish reading the paragraph...
"The
real feminist message should be that when you lose the ability to be
responsible for yourself, you drastically increase the chances that you will
attract the kinds of people who shall we say don't have your best interest at
heart. That's not blaming the victim; that's trying to prevent more
victims."
Also,
true. However, to reflect on Not Monsters, the girl that is drunk
and gets raped by her male "friend" is not the only victim in this
crime. It is most likely that the perpetrator is also a victim of sexual abuse.
It's not just a drink-for-drink competition. Hence, the cycle of abuse
continues.
What
really got me, though, about this article is that Yoffee explains that she has
a teenage daughter and she expects her to drink. But, she tells her daughter to
limit herself to two drinks, to sip slowly, and don't do shots. Emily, do
you really think this is going to work?
Here's
an idea when relaying the message about sex, drugs, alcohol, and...sex crimes.
Why
don't we as parents and mentors take the progressive point of view. After all
it works in Europe, and that is, let's not make sex, drugs, and alcohol sound
so deviant and promiscuous. Did we not learn anything from Adam and Eve in the
Garden of Eden and the forbidden fruit? If it sounds bad, kids are going to
dive in head first. Let's try having an open, honest, and logical conversation
with our youth and say: When you drink alcohol you get drunk. When you get
drunk, your inhibitions are lowered. When your inhibitions are lowered, you
tend to be impulsive. Any form of logical thinking is jaded. Therefore, it is
possible that you (as the intoxicated person) will have regrets when you reach
sobriety.
There
are two rules to live by:
1). People
are shit. Period. Yes, there are good people in the world, but most generally,
people are shit. People shit on you, and will continue to do so throughout your
adult life. There is no reason for it. No explanation. It's just one of those
unspoken entities in life.
2).
There are no guarantees in life except to pay taxes and die.
If
my mother told me not to take a shot of wild turkey, oh honey, you
better believe, wild turkey is the first drink I am going to swallow. Forbidden
Fruit, people! Need I say more? My advice on child molesters...pay less
attention to the media and pick up a copy of Not Monsters. It is
mind-numbing, informative and completely disturbing.
Priceless.
Comments
Post a Comment